David Adair's fish story

[c***@gmail.com]

You are the greatest grammar expert ever existed. Mother Fuck that just makes you expert in rocketry. Shut the Fuck up. I hate debunkers that start pointing out nonsensical bullshit and say see see there is something he might not know do the discounts his entire life.

[c***@gmail.com]

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time
he appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential
tritium
Stephen Hawking
(does anyone else refer to this man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid hydrogen
and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide. Probably
because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

Dear GOD this is an old fucking post. I didn't even know Google was around in 1997. Am I seeing shit or was this post started in 1997? Anyhow, just wanted to chime in on the old thread. Davids claims are pretty friggin out there. I've had a number of strange circumstances in my life that people believe I've made up, but I got nothin on this guy. However, with that said, I don't think any of us have enough information to say his story is or isn't true. We can say we know he's full of shit to our very core, and as has happened on many occasions in history, we have to eat our words. One thing I have noticed is that I haven't been able to find a single video or post with someone saying that they knew/know him and it's true or that they knew/know him and it's all made up. It's not like he's hidden his identity. in almost 70 years there has got to be SOMEBODY in his past that has a computer and has come across one of his videos. Just strange. All I can say, is that I don't know, and neither does anyone else for that matter. We may THINK we know, but until we can prove it one way or the other, all we can do is make a guess. My GUT tells me he's FOS, but hey, I've been wrong even when I was 100% positive.

[vallor]

Post by c***@gmail.com

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time he
appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential tritium Stephen Hawking (does anyone else refer to this
man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there with
Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid hydrogen
and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide. Probably
because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

Dear GOD this is an old fucking post. I didn't even know Google was
around in 1997. Am I seeing shit or was this post started in 1997?

Thread is from 1997, from before Google -- posted here, in the USENET
newsgroup alt.fan.art-bell, which has been around since 1994 or so.

Google bought Dejanews (a USENET provider) at one point, and turned it
into "Google Groups". A lot of it is still USENET, they just have their
own particular interface into it, the web-based one you are using, G2.

Post by c***@gmail.com
Anyhow, just wanted to chime in on the old thread. Davids claims are
pretty friggin out there. I've had a number of strange circumstances in
my life that people believe I've made up, but I got nothin on this guy.
However, with that said, I don't think any of us have enough information
to say his story is or isn't true. We can say we know he's full of shit
to our very core, and as has happened on many occasions in history, we
have to eat our words. One thing I have noticed is that I haven't been
able to find a single video or post with someone saying that they
knew/know him and it's true or that they knew/know him and it's all made
up. It's not like he's hidden his identity. in almost 70 years there has
got to be SOMEBODY in his past that has a computer and has come across
one of his videos. Just strange. All I can say, is that I don't know,
and neither does anyone else for that matter. We may THINK we know, but
until we can prove it one way or the other, all we can do is make a
guess. My GUT tells me he's FOS, but hey, I've been wrong even when I
was 100% positive.

I don't even remember the guy. But his interview is on youface:

So now I'm going to listen and see how far I get through the program.

[vallor]

Post by vallor

Post by c***@gmail.com

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time he
appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential tritium Stephen Hawking (does anyone else refer to this
man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid
hydrogen and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide.
Probably because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

Dear GOD this is an old fucking post. I didn't even know Google was
around in 1997. Am I seeing shit or was this post started in 1997?

Thread is from 1997, from before Google -- posted here, in the USENET
newsgroup alt.fan.art-bell, which has been around since 1994 or so.
Google bought Dejanews (a USENET provider) at one point, and turned it
into "Google Groups". A lot of it is still USENET, they just have their
own particular interface into it, the web-based one you are using, G2.

Post by c***@gmail.com
Anyhow, just wanted to chime in on the old thread. Davids claims are
pretty friggin out there. I've had a number of strange circumstances in
my life that people believe I've made up, but I got nothin on this guy.
However, with that said, I don't think any of us have enough
information to say his story is or isn't true. We can say we know he's
full of shit to our very core, and as has happened on many occasions in
history, we have to eat our words. One thing I have noticed is that I
haven't been able to find a single video or post with someone saying
that they knew/know him and it's true or that they knew/know him and
it's all made up. It's not like he's hidden his identity. in almost 70
years there has got to be SOMEBODY in his past that has a computer and
has come across one of his videos. Just strange. All I can say, is that
I don't know, and neither does anyone else for that matter. We may
THINK we know, but until we can prove it one way or the other, all we
can do is make a guess. My GUT tells me he's FOS, but hey, I've been
wrong even when I was 100% positive.

http://youtu.be/kD99Bej4A9c
So now I'm going to listen and see how far I get through the program.

Didn't make it all the way through.

* There is _no_ temperature in space, it's like a vacuum bottle (any
temperature one gets or loses is radiative).
* His starchild idea with IQ in the 1000's seems a bit...touched.
* Story about Challenger was intriguing, but can't see how he would know
what he claimed to know about what the shuttle inhabitants were doing on
the way to the ground.
* No, the shuttle stack would not have the explosive potential of a 5MT
warhead. (Imagine what that would do if it blew up on the pad.)
* How did he get his alleged cryogenic fuels into the middle of his miles
of cowpatch?
* Cow mishap story: no comment, except it sounds like a porky
* Fusion engine? being charitable: he may have thought he was building
one, but no, there are no fusion engines
* And the story goes downhill from there -- man, what a whopper!

Entertaining stuff, but couldn't sit through the callers.

In passing, this was the night that Bell first broadcast on WABC NY --
and he mentions having an interview earlier with someone. I _think_ he
said Sean Hannity -- but I could have misheard it, and wasn't motivated
enough to rewind.

[c***@gmail.com]

Post by vallor

Post by vallor

Post by c***@gmail.com

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time he
appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential tritium Stephen Hawking (does anyone else refer to this
man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid
hydrogen and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide.
Probably because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

Dear GOD this is an old fucking post. I didn't even know Google was
around in 1997. Am I seeing shit or was this post started in 1997?

Thread is from 1997, from before Google -- posted here, in the USENET
newsgroup alt.fan.art-bell, which has been around since 1994 or so.
Google bought Dejanews (a USENET provider) at one point, and turned it
into "Google Groups". A lot of it is still USENET, they just have their
own particular interface into it, the web-based one you are using, G2.

Post by c***@gmail.com
Anyhow, just wanted to chime in on the old thread. Davids claims are
pretty friggin out there. I've had a number of strange circumstances in
my life that people believe I've made up, but I got nothin on this guy.
However, with that said, I don't think any of us have enough
information to say his story is or isn't true. We can say we know he's
full of shit to our very core, and as has happened on many occasions in
history, we have to eat our words. One thing I have noticed is that I
haven't been able to find a single video or post with someone saying
that they knew/know him and it's true or that they knew/know him and
it's all made up. It's not like he's hidden his identity. in almost 70
years there has got to be SOMEBODY in his past that has a computer and
has come across one of his videos. Just strange. All I can say, is that
I don't know, and neither does anyone else for that matter. We may
THINK we know, but until we can prove it one way or the other, all we
can do is make a guess. My GUT tells me he's FOS, but hey, I've been
wrong even when I was 100% positive.

http://youtu.be/kD99Bej4A9c
So now I'm going to listen and see how far I get through the program.

Didn't make it all the way through.
* There is _no_ temperature in space, it's like a vacuum bottle (any
temperature one gets or loses is radiative).
* His starchild idea with IQ in the 1000's seems a bit...touched.
* Story about Challenger was intriguing, but can't see how he would know
what he claimed to know about what the shuttle inhabitants were doing on
the way to the ground.
* No, the shuttle stack would not have the explosive potential of a 5MT
warhead. (Imagine what that would do if it blew up on the pad.)
* How did he get his alleged cryogenic fuels into the middle of his miles
of cowpatch?
* Cow mishap story: no comment, except it sounds like a porky
* Fusion engine? being charitable: he may have thought he was building
one, but no, there are no fusion engines
* And the story goes downhill from there -- man, what a whopper!
Entertaining stuff, but couldn't sit through the callers.
In passing, this was the night that Bell first broadcast on WABC NY --
and he mentions having an interview earlier with someone. I _think_ he
said Sean Hannity -- but I could have misheard it, and wasn't motivated
enough to rewind.
--
-v

Haha! Yeah, I didn't make it through this one

. Like I said, I think he's FOS as well..... but I can't know for sure, but that's my gut feeling.

[k***@gmail.com]

Wow this is cool finding such an old thread that can be replied to. I didn't know anything about David Adair but heard the name before. I googled "David Adair bullshit" after hearing him on Lorien Fenton's show as he said he's going to land on the moon and live stream it for $10 per viewer, which although a very generous fee apparently 8 billion people will pay to watch it. What a lunatic!

[b***@gmail.com]

Post by k***@gmail.com
Wow this is cool finding such an old thread that can be replied to. I didn't know anything about David Adair but heard the name before. I googled "David Adair bullshit" after hearing him on Lorien Fenton's show as he said he's going to land on the moon and live stream it for $10 per viewer, which although a very generous fee apparently 8 billion people will pay to watch it. What a lunatic!

I love seeing old threads with dead poasters such as old Grim Quarnhole. Makes me feel young again.

[m***@yahoo.com]

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time
he appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential
tritium
Stephen Hawking
(does anyone else refer to this man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid hydrogen
and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide. Probably
because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

I hadn't heard of David Adair until I accidently pressed a youtube thumbnail by accident, when I watched 15 minutes of UAMN TV's "Former Area 51 Scientist Discloses projects that have never been seen my the public" (Aug 21, 2018) and found it all familiar to Bob Lazar's cockamamie stories. At least Lazar had a paycheck to prove he worked in a general capacity of his hyperbolic claims. I can't find anything scientific written, hypothesized, modeled, etc. by Mr. Adair. No proof of anything within any rocket science field. I found stuff on him that everyone basically knows of him existing and his belief(s) of UFO's and alien crafts but absolutely nothing credible in his alleged "field". Seeing as how I just now am getting to know of this guy, I don't remember if he even called himself a scientist. I think all of these honorifics come from KOOKS and their titles of their thumbnails as David Adair as their subject/interviewee. With a guy claiming to be the only person to have made an impossible engine (as he describes), you'd think he'd show operational small scale models, maths, or sciences proving such. Even a small, harmless "Mr. Wizard", "Bill Nye" (he, too, is questionable) "Beakman" type of experiment Mr Adair might've observed serendipitously, while coming up with his mathand technology. But, alas, nothing to make Mr. Adair, at all, credible. I did find this little "tid bit" that I liked enough to repost here. any way Who is David Adair?


Scott Hanson, former Electronic Warfare Technician at United States Navy (1990-1994)
Answered Aug 10, 2018 · Author has 2.2k answers and 5.6m answer views
What is unbelievable or believable about David Adair's rocket and Area 51 story?

Well the short list here is to list what is believable….

NOTHING.

The longer list is what is unbelievable which is everything else.

David Adair is no rocket scientist. He is a failed actor with three bit part credits to his name in the late 80’s and early 90’s

He then reinvented himself as this super genius who invented something no one else can, and from nothing mind you… and for which there is still no evidence of.

All of his supposed accolades and awards are fake. No evidence of them exists. and to claim it was all “covered up by Area 51” is just convenient bullshit to cover the fact there is no such thing as what he invented or the stories he told.

He was on Coast to Coast AM, which is an ENTERTAINMENT program aimed at the stupid and gullible. Filled with idiots and kooks who call in with their stupidly outlandish tales.

David Adair is a fraud.

[Teh Barfing Yak]

Post by m***@yahoo.com

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time
he appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential
tritium
Stephen Hawking
(does anyone else refer to this man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid hydrogen
and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide. Probably
because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

I hadn't heard of David Adair until I accidently pressed a youtube thumbnail by accident, when I watched 15 minutes of UAMN TV's "Former Area 51 Scientist Discloses projects that have never been seen my the public" (Aug 21, 2018) and found it all familiar to Bob Lazar's cockamamie stories. At least Lazar had a paycheck to prove he worked in a general capacity of his hyperbolic claims. I can't find anything scientific written, hypothesized, modeled, etc. by Mr. Adair. No proof of anything within any rocket science field. I found stuff on him that everyone basically knows of him existing and his belief(s) of UFO's and alien crafts but absolutely nothing credible in his alleged "field". Seeing as how I just now am getting to know of this guy, I don't remember if he even called himself a scientist. I think all of these honorifics come from KOOKS and their titles of their thumbnails as David Adair as their subject/interviewee. With a guy claiming to be the only person to have made an impossible engine (as he describes), you'd think he'd show operational small scale models, maths, or sciences proving such. Even a small, harmless "Mr. Wizard", "Bill Nye" (he, too, is questionable) "Beakman" type of experiment Mr Adair might've observed serendipitously, while coming up with his mathand technology. But, alas, nothing to make Mr. Adair, at all, credible. I did find this little "tid bit" that I liked enough to repost here. any way Who is David Adair?
Scott Hanson, former Electronic Warfare Technician at United States Navy (1990-1994)
Answered Aug 10, 2018 · Author has 2.2k answers and 5.6m answer views
What is unbelievable or believable about David Adair's rocket and Area 51 story?
Well the short list here is to list what is believable….
NOTHING.
The longer list is what is unbelievable which is everything else.
David Adair is no rocket scientist. He is a failed actor with three bit part credits to his name in the late 80’s and early 90’s
He then reinvented himself as this super genius who invented something no one else can, and from nothing mind you… and for which there is still no evidence of.
All of his supposed accolades and awards are fake. No evidence of them exists. and to claim it was all “covered up by Area 51” is just convenient bullshit to cover the fact there is no such thing as what he invented or the stories he told.
He was on Coast to Coast AM, which is an ENTERTAINMENT program aimed at the stupid and gullible. Filled with idiots and kooks who call in with their stupidly outlandish tales.
David Adair is a fraud.

Pull your head out of your ass and smell teh roses.

Schmell teh roses for once in your pudfucking life.

Schmell teh roses, instead of thine sphincter.

Schmell teh sumbitches!

[Colonel Edmund J. Burke]

Post by m***@yahoo.com

David Adair might want to work on the following the next time
he appears on Art Bell's show, which any genius 17-year-old fusion
exponential
tritium
Stephen Hawking
(does anyone else refer to this man as "Steffan?")
I'm also surprized that someone of of Adair's apparent breadth and
depth of knowledge had never heard of Alan Turing.
Adair also refers listeners to a non-existent book in the closing
moments of Art's show for a schematic of his rocket engine, _The
Future of Energy_ published by the AAAS in 1973. He probably means
AAAS, 1973), which does have an illustration of magnetic fusion
confinement that is usually depicted elsewhere in the popular press
in far greater detail. However, there are no illustrations of the
"figuure eight" confinement pattern Adair spoke about, nor is there
anything in the book that even remotely resembles a rocket engine.
I personally would rate Adair's credibility somewhere down there
with Sean David Morton and Mel, I'm afraid.
--
Spencer W. Hunter Tucson, AZ. | veni, vidi, vamos.
gopher://www.u.arizona.edu:80/hGET%20/~shunter

Adair is, quite simply, a liar. And Bell and his audience of the
pathologically gullible never once bothered to question him.
For example he claims to have built a rocket fueled by "liquid hydrogen
and kerosene." Nonsense! Yet Bell just lets it slide. Probably
because he is too ignorant to ask the hard questions.
Typical of the sort of bellshit that is presented.

I hadn't heard of David Adair until I accidently pressed a youtube thumbnail by accident, when I watched 15 minutes of UAMN TV's "Former Area 51 Scientist Discloses projects that have never been seen my the public" (Aug 21, 2018) and found it all familiar to Bob Lazar's cockamamie stories. At least Lazar had a paycheck to prove he worked in a general capacity of his hyperbolic claims. I can't find anything scientific written, hypothesized, modeled, etc. by Mr. Adair. No proof of anything within any rocket science field. I found stuff on him that everyone basically knows of him existing and his belief(s) of UFO's and alien crafts but absolutely nothing credible in his alleged "field". Seeing as how I just now am getting to know of this guy, I don't remember if he even called himself a scientist. I think all of these honorifics come from KOOKS and their titles of their thumbnails as David Adair as their subject/interviewee. With a guy claiming to be the only person to have made an impossible engine (as he describes), you'd think he'd show operational small scale models, maths, or sciences proving such. Even a small, harmless "Mr. Wizard", "Bill Nye" (he, too, is questionable) "Beakman" type of experiment Mr Adair might've observed serendipitously, while coming up with his mathand technology. But, alas, nothing to make Mr. Adair, at all, credible. I did find this little "tid bit" that I liked enough to repost here. any way Who is David Adair?
Scott Hanson, former Electronic Warfare Technician at United States Navy (1990-1994)
Answered Aug 10, 2018 · Author has 2.2k answers and 5.6m answer views
What is unbelievable or believable about David Adair's rocket and Area 51 story?
Well the short list here is to list what is believable….
NOTHING.
The longer list is what is unbelievable which is everything else.
David Adair is no rocket scientist. He is a failed actor with three bit part credits to his name in the late 80’s and early 90’s
He then reinvented himself as this super genius who invented something no one else can, and from nothing mind you… and for which there is still no evidence of.
All of his supposed accolades and awards are fake. No evidence of them exists. and to claim it was all “covered up by Area 51” is just convenient bullshit to cover the fact there is no such thing as what he invented or the stories he told.
He was on Coast to Coast AM, which is an ENTERTAINMENT program aimed at the stupid and gullible. Filled with idiots and kooks who call in with their stupidly outlandish tales.
David Adair is a fraud.

[m***@gmail.com]

He is full of shit.
He's clearly an actor. He even has his own imdb page.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1583972/

Either that or the people at Area 51 were nice enough to let him out so he could play Dermont on the TV series "Minder"

Just saying.

[Teh Barfing Yak]

Post by m***@gmail.com
He is full of shit.
He's clearly an actor. He even has his own imdb page.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1583972/
Either that or the people at Area 51 were nice enough to let him out so he could play Dermont on the TV series "Minder"
Just saying.

You are a lacklustered little dingot, mein himmler.

[m***@gmail.com]

You're a semen slurper who can't spell the word "the" :)

[Teh Barfing Yak]

Post by m***@gmail.com
You're a semen slurper who can't spell the word "the" :)

Teh hell wiht you, mein himmler.

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by Teh Barfing Yak

Post by m***@gmail.com
You're a semen slurper who can't spell the word "the" :)

Teh hell wiht you, mein himmler.

Haha, to hell with you.
You should have ended as a red stain on a used tampon. Unfortunately your mother can't keep her legs shut and now the rest of humanity has to fight the urge not to punch you in your semen slurping face.

[Teh Barfing Yak]

Post by m***@gmail.com

Post by Teh Barfing Yak

Post by m***@gmail.com
You're a semen slurper who can't spell the word "the" :)

Teh hell wiht you, mein himmler.

Haha, to hell with you.
You should have ended as a red stain on a used tampon. Unfortunately your mother can't keep her legs shut and now the rest of humanity has to fight the urge not to punch you in your semen slurping face.

You missed your dingleberry omelette this morning, you hermaphroditic weasel.

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by Teh Barfing Yak
You missed your dingleberry omelette this morning, you hermaphroditic weasel.

Oh my God, you suuuuuuck.

It's cool though.

Keep slurping bro, keep slurping.

[Teh Barfing Yak]

Post by m***@gmail.com

Post by Teh Barfing Yak
You missed your dingleberry omelette this morning, you hermaphroditic weasel.

Oh my God, you suuuuuuck.
It's cool though.
Keep slurping bro, keep slurping.

You encrusted little tartitude. Feed away at the trough of my perineum, you engruviated blogart.

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by Teh Barfing Yak
You encrusted little tartitude. Feed away at the trough of my perineum, you engruviated blogart.

Wait, you have to carry your perineum in a trough? That's not normal. It sounds like you may have elephantiasis. Have you fucked any goats in South America lately? Yeah, you probably have. You should get that shit checked out.